Post by account_disabled on Mar 4, 2024 5:11:28 GMT -5
The to research in this post. Are social shares a ranking signal People have noticed the connection between social shares and ranking going back to . But correlating rankings and social signals has been a bit of a catandmouse game. If youve done any SEO at all youve probably noticed that the stories that rank well tend to have high social share counts. These are your unicorns the extremely popular magical pieces of content that drive a ridiculous amount of traffic to your site. These types of elite unicorn content drive x better results than all your other content the donkeys.
Why do topperforming posts often also have a high number of shares What Greece Mobile Number List exactly is causing these observable correlations SFwxCuO.jpg Some SEOs believed that Google was somehow factoring social share counts into the algorithm like links though not with nearly the same amount of weight. Social shares figured into Mozs Search Engine Ranking Factors albeit as a low factor Always controversial the number of social shares a page accumulates tends to show a positive correlation with rankings. Although there is strong reason to believe Google doesnt use social share counts directly in its algorithm there are many secondary SEO benefits to be gained through successful social sharing. Indeed there is a strong reason to believe.
Google doesnt use share counts as a direct ranking factor. Google has said so. no_sheldon_cooper.gif Repeatedly and emphatically. Google doesnt use Facebook Twitter or any other social share counts as a direct ranking factor. Its not shares its engagement We need a new approach to answer these important questions. Maybe were looking at the wrong social metrics. rates rather than just the total number of social shares. What percentage of total unique people who saw your update clicked on it andor shared it VvpSEsH.jpg Perhaps the relationship is that the social posts that get very high engagement rates which leads to high numbers of shares come from the same content that get aboveaverage.
Why do topperforming posts often also have a high number of shares What Greece Mobile Number List exactly is causing these observable correlations SFwxCuO.jpg Some SEOs believed that Google was somehow factoring social share counts into the algorithm like links though not with nearly the same amount of weight. Social shares figured into Mozs Search Engine Ranking Factors albeit as a low factor Always controversial the number of social shares a page accumulates tends to show a positive correlation with rankings. Although there is strong reason to believe Google doesnt use social share counts directly in its algorithm there are many secondary SEO benefits to be gained through successful social sharing. Indeed there is a strong reason to believe.
Google doesnt use share counts as a direct ranking factor. Google has said so. no_sheldon_cooper.gif Repeatedly and emphatically. Google doesnt use Facebook Twitter or any other social share counts as a direct ranking factor. Its not shares its engagement We need a new approach to answer these important questions. Maybe were looking at the wrong social metrics. rates rather than just the total number of social shares. What percentage of total unique people who saw your update clicked on it andor shared it VvpSEsH.jpg Perhaps the relationship is that the social posts that get very high engagement rates which leads to high numbers of shares come from the same content that get aboveaverage.